Across cultures
One culture’s god is another’s demon.
Most of the major demons in the Western tradition are deposed gods of neighbouring peoples. The mechanism is usually visible in the name itself: Baal-Zebul, ‘prince Baal’, becomes Baal-Zebub, ‘lord of the flies’; the goddess Ashtart is given the vowels of bosheth, ‘shame’, and ends up as a male duke of hell.
The sharpest case involves no polemic at all. Sanskrit asura and Avestan ahura are the same inherited word; so are deva and daeva. In Iran the ahuras are divine and the daevas are demons. In India it is exactly the other way round. Two branches of one religion inherited the same two categories and assigned them opposite values. Whatever else that shows, it is hard to read it as anything but evidence that ‘god’ and ‘demon’ are positions in a structure rather than properties of the beings who occupy them.
Two different claims, kept apart
Descent
One figure demonstrably came from another, usually traceable through the name itself. Baal Hadad to Beelzebub to the Goetic Bael is a line of descent.
Equivalence
Two figures fill the same office — by ancient equation, by shared inheritance, or by coincidence. Shango and Thor both throw thunder; neither produced the other.
Collapsing the two makes every figure look related to every other. They are recorded and displayed separately here for that reason.
11 lines
Lines of descent
Each row runs oldest to newest, and every arrow is a claim that the later figure came from the earlier one, with the evidence stated beneath it. These are the strong claims in the compendium.
- satanderives fromangra-mainyu — Structural rather than lexical: the organised adversary with an army and a final judgment.
- satanderives fromveles — The Slavic devil absorbs Veles: his name and attributes pass directly onto the devil in folk usage after Christianisation. One of the best-documented conversions anywhere.
- yanluo-wangderives fromyama — The Indian Yama entered China with Buddhism and was reorganised as a magistrate of the celestial bureaucracy.
- ten-kingsderives fromyama — The Chinese court of the dead is built out of the Indian Yama, reorganised into a bureaucracy with intervals, clerks and an appeal.
Baal Hadad
Canaanite · c. 1400 BCE
- →
Adramelech
c. 400 BCE
Baalberith
c. 400 BCE
Bael
c. 400 BCE
Beelzebub
c. 400 BCE
Rimmon
c. 400 BCE
- beelzebubderives frombaal-hadad — Baal-Zebul, 'prince Baal', deliberately misvocalised in Hebrew as Baal-Zebub, 'lord of the flies'.
- baelderives frombaal-hadad — The first spirit of the Goetia carries the bare title 'lord' as a personal name, three thousand years downstream.
- adramelechderives frombaal-hadad — A Sepharvite god of the Baal type, made chancellor of hell by early-modern demonology.
- baalberithderives frombaal-hadad — Baal-berith, 'lord of the covenant', a god of Shechem before he was made hell's notary.
- rimmonderives frombaal-hadad — The Aramean storm god of Damascus, later given a diplomatic posting by de Plancy.
- leviathanderives fromlotan — Isaiah 27:1 reuses the Ugaritic epithets for Lotan almost verbatim.
- leviathan-spiritderives fromleviathan — Job's creature read as a spirit of pride and twisted speech.
- astarothderives fromastarte — Ashtoreth — the goddess's consonants with the vowels of bosheth, 'shame' — becomes a male duke of hell.
- asmodayderives fromaeshma — Aeshma-daeva to Ashmedai to Asmodeus — the strongest name-level link between the two traditions.
- lilithderives fromlamashtu — The child-threatening demoness of the incantation bowls, inherited through the Mesopotamian lilitu.
- alastorderives fromerinyes — The Greek avenging spirit of blood-guilt, taken up as a personal name for hell's executioner.
- atumderives fromnun — Rises out of the primeval waters on the first mound.
- sons-of-godderives fromel — The assembly of El in Ugaritic literature has the same vocabulary and the same shape three centuries earlier; the Hebrew council keeps the structure and changes who presides.
- jezebel-spiritderives fromjezebel — The category is built from the queen of 1 Kings by way of the label in Revelation 2:20.
7 fields
Fields of equivalence
Clusters of figures that sources or scholarship equate with one another. These are weaker claims than descent and they form large groups by nature, so each is drawn as a graph — the cords show which specific pairs are equated, rather than implying that everyone in a cluster is the same figure.
Reading this diagram
Each dot is a figure, placed clockwise from the oldest. A cord means a source or a scholarly consensus equates that pair. Dot size is the number of equivalences recorded for that figure, so the largest dots are the ones everyone else gets compared to.
Hover any dot to isolate its links and read the reason for each. Colour is alignment, not culture.
Busiest node: Satan with 10 recorded equivalences.
An equivalence is not a claim of descent. Some of these pairs are historical equations made in antiquity, some are shared Indo-European inheritance, and some are pure functional parallels between traditions that never met. The note on each link says which.
Reading this diagram
Each dot is a figure, placed clockwise from the oldest. A cord means a source or a scholarly consensus equates that pair. Dot size is the number of equivalences recorded for that figure, so the largest dots are the ones everyone else gets compared to.
Hover any dot to isolate its links and read the reason for each. Colour is alignment, not culture.
Busiest node: Hermes with 6 recorded equivalences.
An equivalence is not a claim of descent. Some of these pairs are historical equations made in antiquity, some are shared Indo-European inheritance, and some are pure functional parallels between traditions that never met. The note on each link says which.
Reading this diagram
Each dot is a figure, placed clockwise from the oldest. A cord means a source or a scholarly consensus equates that pair. Dot size is the number of equivalences recorded for that figure, so the largest dots are the ones everyone else gets compared to.
Hover any dot to isolate its links and read the reason for each. Colour is alignment, not culture.
Busiest node: Enki with 3 recorded equivalences.
An equivalence is not a claim of descent. Some of these pairs are historical equations made in antiquity, some are shared Indo-European inheritance, and some are pure functional parallels between traditions that never met. The note on each link says which.
Reading this diagram
Each dot is a figure, placed clockwise from the oldest. A cord means a source or a scholarly consensus equates that pair. Dot size is the number of equivalences recorded for that figure, so the largest dots are the ones everyone else gets compared to.
Hover any dot to isolate its links and read the reason for each. Colour is alignment, not culture.
Busiest node: Azazel with 3 recorded equivalences.
An equivalence is not a claim of descent. Some of these pairs are historical equations made in antiquity, some are shared Indo-European inheritance, and some are pure functional parallels between traditions that never met. The note on each link says which.
Reading this diagram
Each dot is a figure, placed clockwise from the oldest. A cord means a source or a scholarly consensus equates that pair. Dot size is the number of equivalences recorded for that figure, so the largest dots are the ones everyone else gets compared to.
Hover any dot to isolate its links and read the reason for each. Colour is alignment, not culture.
Busiest node: The Asuras with 2 recorded equivalences.
An equivalence is not a claim of descent. Some of these pairs are historical equations made in antiquity, some are shared Indo-European inheritance, and some are pure functional parallels between traditions that never met. The note on each link says which.
Reading this diagram
Each dot is a figure, placed clockwise from the oldest. A cord means a source or a scholarly consensus equates that pair. Dot size is the number of equivalences recorded for that figure, so the largest dots are the ones everyone else gets compared to.
Hover any dot to isolate its links and read the reason for each. Colour is alignment, not culture.
Busiest node: The Nephilim with 2 recorded equivalences.
An equivalence is not a claim of descent. Some of these pairs are historical equations made in antiquity, some are shared Indo-European inheritance, and some are pure functional parallels between traditions that never met. The note on each link says which.
Reading this diagram
Each dot is a figure, placed clockwise from the oldest. A cord means a source or a scholarly consensus equates that pair. Dot size is the number of equivalences recorded for that figure, so the largest dots are the ones everyone else gets compared to.
Hover any dot to isolate its links and read the reason for each. Colour is alignment, not culture.
Busiest node: The Jezebel Spirit with 2 recorded equivalences.
An equivalence is not a claim of descent. Some of these pairs are historical equations made in antiquity, some are shared Indo-European inheritance, and some are pure functional parallels between traditions that never met. The note on each link says which.
15 cultures
Pantheons, oldest first
When each pantheon is attested
Bars span the earliest and latest first-attestation dates among the figures recorded here, with the number of figures at the right.
The axis is calendar years, BCE to the left of zero. Bar length reflects how wide a span this compendium covers for that culture, not how long the religion actually lasted — a short bar usually means the surviving sources cluster in a single period.
The Canaanite and Mesopotamian bars sit roughly two thousand years before the texts that turned their gods into demons.
Egyptian
c. 3200 BCECanaanite
c. 2500 BCEMesopotamian
c. 2500 BCEVedic
c. 1400 BCEPersian
c. 1000 BCEGreek
c. 700 BCERoman
c. 500 BCEChinese
c. 300 BCEJapanese
c. 100 BCECeltic
c. 100 BCEBuddhist
c. 100 BCESlavic
c. 980 CENorse
c. 1270 CEMesoamerican
c. 1400 CEYoruba
c. 1500 CEShared offices
Which powers recur where
Most widely shared offices
How many of the 19 culture groups attribute each office to at least one of their figures.
A long bar means the job exists nearly everywhere — carrying messages, conducting the dead, governing storms. A short bar means the office belongs to one tradition's particular concerns.
Full office matrix
Every office down the rows, every culture group across the columns, with a count of how many figures in that group are credited with it.
Brighter cells and higher numbers mean more figures. A dense top row is the argument that these traditions are describing the same set of jobs; the sparse lower rows are where they genuinely differ.