ColossiansOne

Deity Β· Mesopotamian Β· c. 1800 BCE

Lamashtu

Also called Dimme Β· also recorded as π’€­π’ˆ•π’ˆ¨ (per Wikidata)

A daughter of the sky god who preys on pregnant women and newborns. She is the closest parallel to Lilith, and most likely the actual ancestor.

Historical depiction of Lamashtu, Mesopotamian deity β€” editor Austen Henry Layard , drawing by L. Gruner β€” 'Monuments of Nineveh, Second Series' plate 5, London, J. Murray, 1853
Public domain Β· editor Austen Henry Layard , drawing by L. Gruner Β· Wikimedia Commons file page
60attested

Well sourced

DisputedDemonessMesopotamian

Lamashtu is the strongest candidate for the actual ancestor of Lilith, and the incantation literature against her is substantial enough to argue from. She is a daughter of the sky god Anu, which is the detail that matters: she is not a demon sent by anyone, she acts on her own authority and cannot be dismissed by appeal to a higher power, and the counter-measures against her are correspondingly elaborate. What she does is seize infants from the womb and from the breast. That the oldest heavily attested harmful spirit in the record is female, high-born, and specialised in exactly the death that was most common is not a coincidence anyone has to strain to explain.

Identity

Where does the name come from?

Where it was actually worshipped

None; known from incantation plaques and amulets meant to drive her off, which is the opposite of a cult.

A figure with temples and a figure that only ever existed on a page are different kinds of thing, and the difference is easy to lose once both are entries in a list.

At a glance

Vitals

Vitals

Also known as

Dimmeπ’€­π’ˆ•π’ˆ¨
Rank
Demoness
Pantheon
Mesopotamian
Order
Mesopotamian demons
Base of operations
None; known from incantation plaques and amulets meant to drive her off, which is the opposite of a cult.
Era
c. 1800 BCE
Traditions
Mesopotamian

Traits

Domain
Childbirth, infant death, fever
Traditional form
Lion-headed with a donkey's ears, suckling a pig and a dog

Stats

Source base60/100
StandingActs on her own authority, unlike lesser demons
Texts naming it2
Powers attributed2

Known connections

2 attributed

What is it said to do?

Where these powers cluster

The 2 offices attributed to Lamashtu, grouped by kind. Segment width is the share of powers falling in each category.

A bar dominated by one colour means a specialist; an even spread means a figure the sources credit with almost anything.

  • malefic2

malefic

2 marks

Which marks is it attached to?

A mark a figure carries and a mark used against a figure are opposite claims, so each link says which it is.

2 claims

What is it blamed for?

Harms attributed to this figure by a named text. An attribution is not a diagnosis, and where a claim carries a grading it is about how well it rests on the passage it cites.

2 texts

Which texts say so?

When these texts were written

Each dot is one of the 2 texts that names Lamashtu, placed at that text's approximate date.

A wide spread means the figure was carried across many centuries and traditions; a tight cluster means a single period produced the whole record.

2 texts spanning roughly 200 years

The Lamashtu Seriesc. 1800–600 BCE
Lamashtu

Three tablets of canonical material directed at this one figure. That she has a series of her own is the finding: no other spirit in this corpus is important enough to be given one, and its subject throughout is keeping her from mothers and infants. Described here and never quoted, per the standing rule.

LamashtuDaughter of Anu

The incantation series against her runs to several tablets. She seizes infants from the womb and the breast, and acts on her own authority rather than on orders, which lesser demons do not.

Connections

What is it connected to?

Placement

Where does it sit in the hierarchies?

Answered from the sources

Common questions

Which texts mention Lamashtu?

ColossiansOne records 2 texts naming Lamashtu: The Lamashtu Series and Akkadian Incantation Series & Amulet Inscriptions. The earliest is The Lamashtu Series (c. 1800–600 BCE), which gives the name as Lamashtu.

Is Lamashtu the same as Lilith?

ColossiansOne records the link as "derived from" rather than as simple identity. The child-threatening demoness of the incantation bowls, inherited through the Mesopotamian lilitu. Where texts disagree about whether two names denote one figure, the disagreement is shown rather than resolved.

What rank is Lamashtu?

Lamashtu is ranked as Demoness in Akkadian Incantation Series & Amulet Inscriptions. Rank in this material is a claim made by a particular text, not a fixed property of the figure.

How else is Lamashtu spelled?

The name appears as Dimme and π’€­π’ˆ•π’ˆ¨. Variation on this scale is the norm: these names cross Ugaritic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin and vernacular transmission, and each step reshapes the spelling. Every profile records the name as each text gives it.

What is Lamashtu said to do?

The sources credit Lamashtu with 2 distinct powers or offices, including Causes Sickness and Torments. Each is attributed on the profile to the text that claims it. ColossiansOne describes what the texts say; it does not endorse the claims or reproduce them as instruction.

How old is Lamashtu?

The earliest attestation in this corpus dates to c. 1800 BCE. That is when the name first appears in a surviving text, which is a lower bound rather than an origin β€” a figure known from three tablets was probably named in many more that did not survive. Lamashtu is classified as disputed in ColossiansOne.

Nearest in the corpus

If Lamashtu is what you came for, these are next

Chosen by proximity rather than by popularity: the same pantheon first, then the same rank, then the same kind of figure.

The books behind Lamashtu

Every claim on this profile is attributed to one of these. They are public domain, listed oldest first, and each links to a full text where one is freely available.

Corpus last revised 29 August 2026. A reference site’s credibility rests on being maintained, so this is the date the sourced records last changed β€” not the date the page was rebuilt.