ColossiansOne

Deity · Persian · c. 1000 BCE

Aeshma

Also called Aeshma Daeva, Eshm, Khashm · also recorded as Aēšma (per Wikidata)

The demon of wrath and of the bloody club. He also supplies the most defensible etymology for Asmodeus: *Aeshma-daeva* to *Ashmedai* to *Asmodeus*.

Historical depiction of Aeshma, Persian deity — The original uploader was Ploxhoi at English Wikipedia. — Transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons.
CC BY-SA 3.0 · The original uploader was Ploxhoi at English Wikipedia · Wikimedia Commons file page
48attested

Narrow source base

InfernalDaeva of WrathZoroastrian

Aeshma is the best-evidenced case in the corpus of a named demon crossing intact from one religion into another. In the Avesta he is wrath itself, the daeva of fury and of the bloody club, standing against Sraosha, the yazata of obedience and discipline — a pairing that makes the Zoroastrian scheme unusually legible, because each side is an abstraction with a job. The Persian period puts Jewish communities in sustained contact with that scheme, and the name arrives with them: Aeshma-daeva becomes Ashmedai in the Talmudic material and Asmodeus in Tobit, where he kills seven husbands. What travels is the name and the temperament. What is dropped is the cosmology that made him intelligible.

Identity

Where does the name come from?

Where it was actually worshipped

None. A daeva, driven off rather than approached.

A figure with temples and a figure that only ever existed on a page are different kinds of thing, and the difference is easy to lose once both are entries in a list.

At a glance

Vitals

Vitals

Also known as

Aeshma DaevaEshmKhashmAēšma
Rank
Daeva of Wrath
Pantheon
Persian
Order
Zoroastrian
Base of operations
None. A daeva, driven off rather than approached.
Era
c. 1000 BCE
Traditions
Zoroastrian

Traits

Domain
Wrath, fury, violence
Traditional form
Bearing a bloodied club

Stats

Source base48/100
StandingChief daeva of the assault
Texts naming it2
Powers attributed3

Known connections

Chain of command

Identified with

3 attributed

What is it said to do?

Where these powers cluster

The 3 offices attributed to Aeshma, grouped by kind. Segment width is the share of powers falling in each category.

A bar dominated by one colour means a specialist; an even spread means a figure the sources credit with almost anything.

  • social1
  • malefic2

2 claims

What is it blamed for?

Harms attributed to this figure by a named text. An attribution is not a diagnosis, and where a claim carries a grading it is about how well it rests on the passage it cites.

2 texts

Which texts say so, and where do they disagree?

When these texts were written

Each dot is one of the 2 texts that names Aeshma, placed at that text's approximate date.

A wide spread means the figure was carried across many centuries and traditions; a tight cluster means a single period produced the whole record.

2 texts spanning roughly 1,550 years

Where the texts differ

  • Name: given as Aeshma, Eshm
The Avestac. 1000-400 BCE
AeshmaDaeva

The demon of wrath, opposed by Sraosha, obedience.

Bundahishn9th c. CE, from older material
Eshm

Fury given a rank in the enemy order and a counterpart to face on the good side. His placement matters for this corpus more than his acts: this is the demon whose name crosses into Judaism and comes out as Asmodeus, and the Bundahishn is where the tidy demon-hierarchy that made such a transfer easy is fully set out.

Connections

What is it connected to?

Placement

Where does it sit in the hierarchies?

Answered from the sources

Common questions

Which texts mention Aeshma?

ColossiansOne records 2 texts naming Aeshma: The Avesta and Bundahishn. The earliest is The Avesta (c. 1000-400 BCE), which gives the name as Aeshma.

Is Aeshma the same as Asmoday?

ColossiansOne records the link as "derived from" rather than as simple identity. Aeshma-daeva to Ashmedai to Asmodeus — the strongest name-level link between the two traditions. Where texts disagree about whether two names denote one figure, the disagreement is shown rather than resolved.

What rank is Aeshma?

Aeshma is ranked as Daeva of Wrath in The Avesta. Rank in this material is a claim made by a particular text, not a fixed property of the figure.

How else is Aeshma spelled?

The name appears as Eshm, Aeshma Daeva, Khashm and Aēšma. Variation on this scale is the norm: these names cross Ugaritic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin and vernacular transmission, and each step reshapes the spelling. Every profile records the name as each text gives it.

What is Aeshma said to do?

The sources credit Aeshma with 3 distinct powers or offices, including Sows Discord, Burns & Slays and Torments. Each is attributed on the profile to the text that claims it. ColossiansOne describes what the texts say; it does not endorse the claims or reproduce them as instruction.

How old is Aeshma?

The earliest attestation in this corpus dates to c. 1000 BCE. That is when the name first appears in a surviving text, which is a lower bound rather than an origin — a figure known from three tablets was probably named in many more that did not survive. Aeshma is classified as infernal in ColossiansOne.

Nearest in the corpus

If Aeshma is what you came for, these are next

Chosen by proximity rather than by popularity: the same pantheon first, then the same rank, then the same kind of figure.

The books behind Aeshma

Every claim on this profile is attributed to one of these. They are public domain, listed oldest first, and each links to a full text where one is freely available.

Corpus last revised 29 August 2026. A reference site’s credibility rests on being maintained, so this is the date the sourced records last changed — not the date the page was rebuilt.