ColossiansOne

divine name · c. 95 CE

The Number of the Beast

A number given in Revelation as a puzzle with a stated solution method — 'let him that hath understanding count' — and now the single most recognisable mark in the whole subject.

Roman Asia MinorChristianJewish666χξϛSix hundred threescore and six

What the sources claim for it

In its own text, an identification: a name encoded so that the audience can recognise a specific living enemy without the text naming him.

What is it made of?

A gematria puzzle rather than a quantity: Greek and Hebrew letters double as numerals, so a name can be added up. The best-supported solution is Nero Caesar written in Hebrew letters.

נ

Nun

N

+
ר

Resh

R

+
ו

Vav

O

+
ן

Final nun

N

+
ק

Qof

Q

+
ס

Samekh

S

+
ר

Resh

R

=

Number of the Beast

  1. 01

    Nun · N50.

  2. 02

    Resh · R200 — Neron, the Greek form of the name, transliterated into Hebrew.

  3. 03

    Vav · O6.

  4. 04

    Final nun · N50. Present in the Greek spelling of the name, absent in the Latin one.

  5. 05

    Qof · Q100 — the start of Caesar.

  6. 06

    Samekh · S60.

  7. 07

    Resh · R200. The seven letters total 666; drop the final nun for the Latin spelling and the same name gives 616, the variant some early manuscripts carry.

History

Where does the Number of the Beast come from?

Revelation 13:18 does not present the number as a symbol. It presents it as a cipher and tells the reader it is solvable: the number of the beast is the number of a man. In a world where Greek and Hebrew letters double as numerals, that is an instruction to add up a name, and the oldest and best-supported answer is Nero Caesar written in Hebrew letters, which totals 666. The variant reading 616, present in some early manuscripts, is what the Latin spelling of the same name gives — which is strong evidence the puzzle was about a name rather than a quantity.

What happened afterwards is a study in a mark outliving its key. Once the immediate reference is lost, the number becomes free to attach to anyone: medieval and Reformation writers work it against popes and emperors in turn, and by the modern period it has stopped pointing at a person at all and simply means the diabolical.

The larger argument

Why is it in a corpus about spirits?

666 is what a name looks like once its key is lost. Revelation encodes a specific living man so that its first audience can recognise him and the authorities cannot; within two centuries the reference is gone and the number is free to be aimed at anyone. Every misattribution this site documents — a Canaanite god read as a demon, a medieval emblem read as satanic — is that same process, and this is the case where the text itself tells you a solution was intended.

Afterwards

What did it turn into?

Now the default shorthand for demonic content anywhere in popular culture, and attached to no name at all. The gematria that made it a puzzle is the part that dropped out first.

Which texts describe it?

Oldest first, with what each one does with the mark. A mark described in a Bronze Age incantation and a mark first drawn in a seventeenth-century manuscript are different kinds of claim, whatever the shape has in common.

Nearby

Related marks

All symbols