ColossiansOne

seal · assembled 1897–1969

The Sigil of Baphomet

An inverted pentagram, a goat's head fitted inside it, and the Hebrew letters of Leviathan around the rim — three separate nineteenth- and twentieth-century additions, presented as one ancient mark.

France, then CaliforniaChristianFolk & DemonologicalGoat pentagramLeviathan sigil

What the sources claim for it

A deliberate inversion — the point-down star, the beast in place of the man — designed as an opposition to Christian symbolism rather than as a survival of anything older.

What is it made of?

Three separate additions, each of them datable, presented afterwards as one ancient mark.

1855

The inversion

+
1897

The goat

+
לויתן

The letters

+
1969

The cover

=

Sigil of Baphomet

  1. 01

    The inversionEliphas Lévi gives the point-down pentagram its infernal reading. Before him the orientation carries no such meaning.

  2. 02

    The goatStanislas de Guaita prints a goat's head fitted to the inverted star — the specific image everything later copies.

  3. 03

    The lettersLeviathan in Hebrew, one letter to each point, read counter-clockwise from the bottom. Later again.

  4. 04

    The coverAdopted by the Church of Satan in 1966 and printed on the Satanic Bible in 1969, which is how it reaches everybody else.

History

Where does the Sigil of Baphomet come from?

It can be dated component by component. Eliphas Lévi gives the inverted pentagram its infernal reading in the 1850s and draws his Baphomet figure — neither of which had that meaning before him. Stanislas de Guaita prints a goat's head fitted to an inverted pentagram in 1897. The five Hebrew letters of Leviathan, set one to each point and read counter-clockwise from the bottom, are added later, and the whole is adopted by Anton LaVey's Church of Satan in 1966 and printed on the cover of the Satanic Bible in 1969.

No part of this is medieval, and the name attached to it belongs to a different argument entirely: Baphomet appears in the Templar trial records of 1307 as a confession extracted under torture, with no image and no description that any of these elements come from.

1 figure

Who is it attached to?

Figures who carry it

An attribute rather than a signature — held, worn or associated in the texts and the images.

The larger argument

Why is it in a corpus about spirits?

The most instructive object on the site, because every step of its assembly is documented and none of the steps is old. The name attached to it comes from confessions extracted under torture in 1307 which describe no image at all. If a reader takes one method away from this section, it should be the habit of asking a mark for its earliest dated appearance rather than for its tradition.

Afterwards

What did it turn into?

Consistently presented, by supporters and opponents alike, as an ancient sign of devil worship. It is the most instructive object on the site precisely because every step of its assembly is documented and none of the steps is old.

Which texts describe it?

Oldest first, with what each one does with the mark. A mark described in a Bronze Age incantation and a mark first drawn in a seventeenth-century manuscript are different kinds of claim, whatever the shape has in common.

Nearby

Related marks

All symbols