ColossiansOne

protective · c. 550–330 BCE

The Faravahar

A man in a winged disc, carved above Persian kings and identified as Ahura Mazda by nearly everyone except the inscriptions.

Achaemenid PersiaZoroastrianWinged discFravashi figure

What the sources claim for it

Disputed. Most likely the divine glory attending kingship, on the evidence available.

What is it made of?

Achaemenid royal iconography, with elements that Zoroastrian tradition later assigns meanings the reliefs themselves never state.

The figure in the disc

+
3

The wings

+

The ring

+
3

The tail

=

Faravahar

  1. 01

    The figure in the discA bearded man, one hand raised. Identified as a fravashi, or as khvarenah, royal glory — the ancient sources do not say.

  2. 02

    The wingsThree rows of feathers, read in modern tradition as good thoughts, good words, good deeds.

  3. 03

    The ringHeld in the figure's hand: a contract-ring, the same object Mesopotamian gods hold in the rod-and-ring.

  4. 04

    The tailThree rows again, read as the bad thoughts, words and deeds beneath.

History

Where does the Faravahar come from?

The figure is standard in Achaemenid royal relief — Persepolis, Naqsh-e Rostam, Behistun — and derives visually from the Assyrian and Egyptian winged disc that precedes it by centuries. What it is not is labelled. No Achaemenid inscription identifies it, and the three main readings, each defended by serious scholars, are Ahura Mazda himself, the royal khvarenah or divine glory, and the fravashi or guardian spirit of the individual.

The Avesta, meanwhile, describes fravashis at length as protective spirits of the dead and the unborn, and never mentions this image. So the corpus has a well-attested image with no text and a well-attested doctrine with no image, and the join between them is a nineteenth-century identification that stuck.

1 figure

Who is it attached to?

Figures who carry it

An attribute rather than a signature — held, worn or associated in the texts and the images.

The larger argument

Why is it in a corpus about spirits?

Zoroastrian cosmology is upstream of a great deal that this corpus treats as standard: a genuinely dualist universe, ranked spirits on both sides, and a final judgement. The mark is here because the argument it belongs to — two opposed camps of named beings — is the frame the later demonologies inherit without acknowledging where they got it.

Afterwards

What did it turn into?

Adopted in the twentieth century as the emblem of Zoroastrian identity worldwide, and separately as a secular emblem of Iranian national heritage.

Which texts describe it?

Oldest first, with what each one does with the mark. A mark described in a Bronze Age incantation and a mark first drawn in a seventeenth-century manuscript are different kinds of claim, whatever the shape has in common.

Nearby

Related marks

All symbols