ColossiansOne

seal · 1582–1583

Sigillum Dei Aemeth

A nine-inch wax disc of nested heptagons carrying angel names, made to stand under the legs of a table — the physical foundation of the Enochian sessions.

England, John Dee's householdChristianEnochianSeal of God's Truth

What the sources claim for it

A foundation of divine names. The working rests on it physically as well as figuratively.

What is it made of?

A construction rather than a drawing: each ring is generated from the one outside it by a stated rule, which is why the figure can be rebuilt from the instructions alone.

The outer ring

+
7

The heptagon

+

The heptagram

+

The central cross

=

Sigillum Dei Aemeth

  1. 01

    The outer ringForty letters and numbers, from which the names of the seven archangels are read off in sequence.

  2. 02

    The heptagonSeven sides for seven planetary angels — the count that governs everything inside it.

  3. 03

    The heptagramA seven-pointed star inscribed within, carrying further names at its points.

  4. 04

    The central crossThe middle of the figure, and the point the whole construction is oriented on.

History

Where does Sigillum Dei Aemeth come from?

Dee's angelic diaries describe the seal in construction detail: a heptagram within a heptagon, rings of letters and numbers from which angel names are read out, the whole cut in wax. Four smaller copies went under the table's feet and a larger one under the shewstone. The design is older than Dee — versions circulate in medieval manuscripts — but the version that survived is his.

It belongs with the circle rather than with the seals of spirits. It is not the mark of a being being summoned; it is the ground the working stands on, which is why it is under the furniture rather than in the operator's hand.

The larger argument

Why is it in a corpus about spirits?

Dee's sigil is what happens when the tradition stops copying equipment and starts deriving it. The Ars Goetia's seals cannot be reconstructed if the plate is lost; the Sigillum can, from a rule. That is a different claim about where a mark's authority comes from, made in the same decades as the new natural philosophy and by a man who was part of it.

Afterwards

What did it turn into?

Reconstructed continuously by ceremonial magicians since the Golden Dawn, from Sloane manuscript drawings that disagree with each other on several of the letters.

Which texts describe it?

None, and here is why

Waiting on an edition rather than lacking one. The design descends through the Liber Juratus and Sefer Raziel before Dee reworks it, and Dee's own account survives in Casaubon's 1659 printing, which is public domain and reachable. None of those is in this corpus yet, so the page describes the mark and does not yet cite the books that would carry it.

Nearby

Related marks

All symbols