ColossiansOne

A study from the corpus

How old are the Goetic demons?

The Ars Goetia is a seventeenth-century compilation, printed in 1904, listing seventy-two spirits in a fixed format. It is the most-copied demonology in English and the source of nearly every list circulating online. The obvious question — how much of it is old, and how old — is answerable by counting, and this is the count.

Computed from the corpus at build time. Corpus last revised 29 August 2026.

Published · Updated

The count

72

Spirits listed

68

No witness before 1500

94% of the list

4

Named in an older text

6% of the list

4

Named before 1 BCE

6% of the list

The list turns out to have a small ancient core and a large early-modern body. Of the 72 spirits the Ars Goetia lists, 4 are named in any text older than the early-modern grimoire tradition. The remaining 6894% of the list — first appear in this corpus in the sixteenth century or later, overwhelmingly in Weyer’s Pseudomonarchia of 1577, from which the Goetia derives.

That is not two independent witnesses to seventy-two ancient spirits. It is one list, copied and extended, with a handful of genuinely old names embedded in it — and those 4 are the ones everybody already knows: Astaroth, Asmoday, Bael, Belial. Each is a name the earlier literature already carried — a Canaanite goddess, a Persian demon of wrath, a Semitic storm-god title, a biblical byword for worthlessness — and all of them are attested before the common era.

When is each name first attested?

Earliest attestation of each Goetic spirit, by period
Period of earliest attestationSpiritsShare
Before 1 BCE4
6%
1 – 599 CE0
0%
600 – 1499 CE0
0%
1500 CE onward68
94%

Shares are of the 72 spirits whose earliest attesting text carries a date. The Ars Goetia itself is dated 17th c.; ed. 1904.

The ten oldest names on the list

The ten Goetic spirits with the earliest attestations
SpiritAs the Goetia names itEarliest attesting textDate
Astaroth#29AstarothThe Baal Cycle (Ugaritic Tablets)c. 1400-1200 BCE
Asmoday#32AsmodayThe Avestac. 1000-400 BCE
Bael#1BaelHebrew Bible & Deuterocanonc. 900–100 BCE
Belial#68BelialHebrew Bible & Deuterocanonc. 900–100 BCE
Agares#2AgaresPseudomonarchia Daemonum1577
Vassago#3VassagoPseudomonarchia Daemonum1577
Samigina#4SamiginaPseudomonarchia Daemonum1577
Marbas#5MarbasPseudomonarchia Daemonum1577
Valefor#6ValeforPseudomonarchia Daemonum1577
Amon#7AmonPseudomonarchia Daemonum1577

What the count does and does not show

The list is mostly early-modern, not ancient

The popular claim that these are demons of great antiquity does not survive the count. The overwhelming majority enter the written record in the sixteenth century, and the text they enter it in is the one the Goetia copies from.

The ancient names are the famous ones

The handful with genuinely old attestations are precisely the figures that were already famous from scripture and from the Canaanite and Persian material. Their fame is why they were available to be included, not a result of being included.

Old name does not mean old figure

Even for those few, the name is what carries over. A Canaanite goddess and a Goetic duke share a name and almost nothing else — the rank, the legions, the offices and the form are all the grimoire's own invention.

It is bounded by this corpus

Earliest attestation means the earliest dated text on this site. A wider corpus would move some of these dates earlier and none of them later, so every figure here is a lower bound.

Method

Every attestation in the corpus is one named text saying something about one figure. The cut at 1500 is the boundary of the early-modern grimoire tradition: Weyer’s Pseudomonarchia and the Ars Goetia are one lineage rather than two witnesses, so counting a spirit as attested because both list it would double the evidence without adding any. For each spirit the Ars Goetia lists, this page takes every other text on the site that names the same figure and reports the earliest one carrying a date. Identifications between a Goetic spirit and an older deity are the attributed relations already recorded on the profiles — this study makes no identification of its own, and every row links to the profile where the chain can be checked. The full weighting method is documented separately.

How to cite this

ColossiansOne, “How old are the Goetic demons?”, https://colossiansone.com/studies/how-old-are-the-goetic-demons (corpus revised 29 August 2026).

The underlying texts are public domain. The compilation, the scoring and this analysis are the site’s own, and corrections that identify a misattributed claim or a mis-dated source are the most useful thing anyone can send.